Scientific Name
Rumex salicifolius ssp. triangulivalvis
Scientific Name w/ Auth.
Rumex salicifolius ssp. triangulivalvis Danser
Park
Dinosaur National Monument (DINO)
Sensitive
No
Park Accepted
Accepted
Record Status
Approved
Park Preferred Common Names
Willow dock
Park Synonyms
Rumex mexicanus
Taxonomic Hierarchy
Kingdom | Plantae |
Subkingdom | Viridiplantae |
Infrakingdom | Streptophyta |
Superdivision | Embryophyta |
Division | Tracheophyta |
Subdivision | Spermatophytina |
Class | Magnoliopsida |
Superorder | Caryophyllanae |
Order | Caryophyllales |
Family | Polygonaceae |
Genus | Rumex |
Species | Rumex triangulivalvis |
Subspecies | Rumex salicifolius ssp. triangulivalvis |
Occurrence
Present
Occurrence Notes
Changed from Present in Park per DINO ANCS+ voucher, Voucher verified by W. Fertig, 2005-06, to Historic per Fertig 2009, Bibkey # 662119, to Present per Fertig et al. 2010, Bibkey #664306; Data Source: Fertig et al. 2010, Bibkey #664306
Nativeness
Native
Nativeness Notes
Data Source: Welsh et al. 2003, Bibkey #571923
Abundance
Uncommon
Abundance Notes
Data Source: Fertig et al. 2010, Bibkey #664306
Threatened Endangered Status
State Species of Concern statuses
Ozone Sensitive Status
NatureServe GRank
NatureServe SRank
Observations
0
References
Vouchers
1
External Links
0
Evidence counts shown include evidence for related synonyms.
Created By
Walt Fertig
Created Date
6/20/2006 12:00:00 AM
Last Modified By
helenthomas@nps.gov
Last Modified Date
5/17/2013 4:50:11 PM
Notes
Park Species Detail: Lifeform = Perennial Forb | Distribution = Widespread | Synonyms = Rumex mexicanus, Rumex salicifolius var. mexicanus, Rumex utahensis, Rumex triangulivalvis | Comments = Flora of North America 2005 splits this taxon into 2: Rumex utahensis (without callosities on fruit valves) and Rumex triangulivalvis (with callosities). Distribution and abundance of these segregate taxa in UT is not known. |, Park Species Data Source: DINO ANCS+ voucher
Legacy NPSpecies information may no longer be applicable, please remove if it is not applicable.
In legacy NPSpecies Management priority value was No with comment: Global Rank = G5T5 |